News Indian Link

Elon Musk’s X Corp sues the state of California to overturn the content moderation law.

<p>Elon Musk’s X Corp filed a lawsuit against the state of California on Friday in response to a state legislation mandating social media firms to post their policies for handling hate speech, harassment, misinformation, and extremism.</p>
<p>X, a social media company formerly known as Twitter, claimed that Assembly Bill 587 violates its First Amendment and California state constitution rights to free expression.<img decoding=”async” class=”alignnone wp-image-174431″ src=”” alt=” how conversational upi functions hello the complete guide to voice based payments” width=”1063″ height=”595″ srcset=” 300w,–150×84.jpg 150w” sizes=”(max-width: 1063px) 100vw, 1063px” title=”Elon Musk's X Corp sues the state of California to overturn the content moderation law. 9″></p>
<p>The “true intent” of the statute, according to X in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Sacramento, California, was to put pressure on social media corporations to remove information the government considered undesirable.</p>
<p>Musk, a self-described free speech absolutist who purchased Twitter for $44 billion in October, fired several of the staff members in charge of policing and monitoring material as well as unbanned accounts.</p>
<p>Since Musk took control, there has been a surge in the amount of hate speech on X that targets Jews, Black people, homosexual men, and trans people, according to the Anti-Defamation League and the Center for Countering Digital Hate.</p>
<p>The wealthiest man in the world, Musk, is also the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, two businesses engaged in space research.</p>
<p>Rob Bonta, the attorney general of California, has said that his office will answer the case in court.</p>
<p>According to AB 587, social media businesses that generate at least $100 million in annual gross revenue must publish semi-annual reports outlining their content moderation procedures and providing information on the quantity of offensive postings and the methods used to address them.</p>
<p>Additionally, firms must give copies of their terms of service under the legislation. Civil penalties of up to $15,000 per violation per day are possible for noncompliance.</p>
<p>The bill was passed in September by Democratic Governor of California Gavin Newsom, who said that his administration would prevent social media from being “weaponized” to propagate hatred and misinformation.</p>
<p>Musk fired hundreds of workers after purchasing Twitter, and on Monday he pointed the finger upon the ADL and others for a 60% drop in U.S. advertising income.</p>
<p>A.J. Brown, who left his position as X’s head of brand safety and ad quality in June, said in a recent interview that Musk’s policy changes, which reduced the exposure of offensive postings on X rather than eliminating them, made it difficult to persuade advertisers that the site was secure.</p>

Related posts

OTT streaming applications contact CCI to contest the Play Store Commission’s authority

Conflict over management of Delhi’s Hotel Royal Plaza reaches NCLT

MQDC Displays Exquisite Bangkok Homes in Delhi